SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 341

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Syed Mahmood – Appellant
Versus
Manik Chandra – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE defen- dant in O. S. No. 457 of 1979 on the file of the V additional Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad has challenged the Judgment and Decree of the learned Judge dated 24-12-1982. The suit was decreed. The respondent is the plaintiff. They will be referred to in the same capacity. The plaintiff sought for a declaration that he is the owner and is in possession of the suit property and for possession of the same and such other reliefs as the Court may deem fit to grant. The suit schedule property is described as part of Survey no. 266/b with some descriptions in the schedule. The plaintiff claimed the title to the suit property having an extent of 2965 square yards through his father late B. Ramaiah @ Ramanna who purchased it from one Mahaboob Begum wife of mohammed Abdul Rahman under a sale transaction dated 14th Aban 1238 Fasli i. e. 1919 A. D. His father came into possession of the property under the sale transaction, he continued as such and after the death of his father the plaintiff has been continuing in possession and enjoyment of the same. It appears that there were some litigations between the plaintiffs father and other persons which ended















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top