SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 311

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, D.H.NASIR
Jayakrishna Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
Surekha Panigrahi – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of a petition (O. P. No. 10 of 1990) filed by the appellant herein in the Court of the Principal Subordinate judge, Visakapatnarn, for passing a decree annuling the marriage between him and the respondent, or in the alternative to pass a decree for dissolving the marriage. 7 he petition having been dismissed, the present appeal is filed by the appellant-husband. The appellant married the respondent on 26-11-1986 at Berhwnpur (Orissa State ). It is the case of the appellant that he did not voluntarily agree for the marriage, and the consent was obtained by force as the parents of the appellant threatened to commit suicide if the alliance was not fixed. It is his further case that even the nuptial night ended with lot of unhappiness and frustration. The appellant states that he made it clear to the respondent-wife in the beginning itself that he was totally opposed to the idea of marriage with her and that he was not getting emotional reaction on seeing her. After few days, the appellant submits that he returned to Visakhapatnam, at which place he is employed in the Port Trust. In march, 1987 the respondent was brought to Visakhap

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top