SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 310

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
P. Rama Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Land Reforms and Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge confirming the orders passed by the authorities, be it primary or appellate, under the provisions of Urban Lands (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The appellant holds urban properties within Vijayawada urban agglomeration. He was obligated to file a declaration and he did so. He had declared that he held 1 / 3rd share out of 4261 sq. mtrs. in T. S. No. 29/3 of Vijayawada; 1/3rd share in 919-74 sq. mtrs. with building thereon and 1 /3rd share in 167-23 sq. mtrs. with building thereon, both situated in Ward No. 22 of Vijayawada. The same was verified by the Officer concerned and a draft statement under Section 8 (1) along with a notice under Section 8 (3) of the Act were served on the appellant calling for his objections. In the said statement, 2854 sq. mtrs. in the first item, 290 sq. mtrs. in the second item and 57 sq. mtrs. in the third item making out a total of 3201 sq. mtrs, was sought to be computed to the holding of the appellant. The objections raised by the appellant to the above proposed computation were negatived and computation




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top