SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 352

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Narsingh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Urmilabai – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendant s appeal. The respondent is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 246 of 1982 on the file of Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The judgment and decree of the learned Judge dated 15-1-1983 are challenged in this appeal. The convenience warrants the reference of the parties as the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff claiming to be the landlady of the defendant in regard to the suit property filed the suit for possession and for recovery of the arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 8,700-00 and also for compensation for use and occupation at Rs. 300-00 per mensem from the date of the suit till the date of delivery of possession. The suit property should be styled as demised premises in the nature of the suit and it is described as a plot of land measuring about 2,869 Sq. yards in Ward No. 14, Block No. 8, situate at Seethamata Temple, kanika Adda, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad. The defendant resisted the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the wife of one Laxmi Narayan Singh. She claimed that the demised premises belong to her having purchased it from one Gannu Singh under registered sale deed dated 10-7-1970 for a valuable consideration of rs.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top