B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Narsingh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Urmilabai – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a defendant s appeal. The respondent is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 246 of 1982 on the file of Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The judgment and decree of the learned Judge dated 15-1-1983 are challenged in this appeal. The convenience warrants the reference of the parties as the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff claiming to be the landlady of the defendant in regard to the suit property filed the suit for possession and for recovery of the arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 8,700-00 and also for compensation for use and occupation at Rs. 300-00 per mensem from the date of the suit till the date of delivery of possession. The suit property should be styled as demised premises in the nature of the suit and it is described as a plot of land measuring about 2,869 Sq. yards in Ward No. 14, Block No. 8, situate at Seethamata Temple, kanika Adda, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad. The defendant resisted the suit.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the wife of one Laxmi Narayan Singh. She claimed that the demised premises belong to her having purchased it from one Gannu Singh under registered sale deed dated 10-7-1970 for a valuable consideration of rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.