SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 334

K.M.AGARWAL, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Alapati Hymavati (died) – Appellant
Versus
Namburi Basava Subrahmanyam – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS L. P. A. arises outof the Judgment and decree of the learned single Judge in A. S. No. 1654/80, confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial court in O. S. No. 35/78 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali.

( 2 ) THE 1st appellant is the plaintiff. She and wife of the 1st respondent vimalavathy, are sisters and are the daughters one Seshamma. Seshamma executed 2 documents Ex. B-1 and B-2 both dated 1-12-1958 by which she settled certain properties on the 1st appellant, Vimalavathy. The wife of the 1st respondent died on 4-5-1970 leaving the 1st respondent as her heir. Thereafter, seshamma executed Ex. A-1 alleged will dt. 21-8-1970 revoking Ex. B-1 dated 1-12-1958 and bequeathing the properties covered by Ex. B-1 in favour of the 1 st appellant/plaintiff. Seshamma died on 26-1-1976. The suit was filed for possession of some items of suit property on the basis that Ex. B-1 wasa will and not a settlement deed and hence the revocation deed Ex. A-1 dt. 21-8-1970 was valid and that the plaintiff/appellant was entitled to the suit property. 1st respondent s case is Ex. B-1 was not a will but a settlement deed by which mere was disposition












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top