SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 382

R.M.BAPAT
Jitendra Palnitker – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed under Section 482 Cr. P. C. for release of Hero Honda Motor Cycle bearing R. T. O. Registration No. A. P. 9c 2803 in favour of the petitioner herein.

( 2 ) IN this matter, a small but very interesting point has been agitated before this Court for consideration.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner submitted at the Bar that the offence against the petitioner under the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act and Andhra Pradesh Excise Act is yet to be proved. The motor cycle in question is exposed to the atmosphere condition and it is lying without any care being taken. Thus, at the end of trial even if the accused is acquitted, the motor cycle will lose its value and therefore prayed for the interim custody of the said vehicle.

( 4 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State submitted at the Bar that the motor cycle is liable to be confiscated and the confiscation is to be done by the Prohibition and Excise Officials. The Magistrate has no jurisdiction to pass even an interim order regarding the release of the motor cycle. Therefore, the legal question posed before me as to whether the Magistrate has jurisdiction to pass

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top