SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 406

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
Malla Venkataswamy Mandadi – Appellant
Versus
Sreepuram Munemma – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal by Defendants 3 and 4 in O. S. No. 493/74 on the file of the District Munsif, Srikalahasti. The suit was filed for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of Ac. 5-00 of land, more specifically described in the schedule. The Plaintiff s case before the trial court, was that she purchased the land for valuable consideration. By the side of the scheduled property, defendants 1 to 4 also pruchased Ac. 20-00 of land at the rate of ac. 5-00 each. Though they have no right or title in the land purchased by the plaintiff, they were attempting to interfere with the same. Defendants denied the claim of the plaintiff. Evidence let in and the suit was dismissed, against which an appeal in A. S. No. 101/85 was preferred by the plaintiff before the subordinate Judge, Srikalahasthi.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of appeal, defendants 1 and 2 passed away. No application under Order 22, Rule 4 was filed to bring their Legal representatives on record. Lower appellate court heard the plaintiff and the remaining defendants and passed the judgment, allowing the appeal.

( 3 ) NOW it is contended by Sri. P. S. Narayana, learned counsel for the def











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top