( 1 ) THE defendant in O. S. No. 139 of 1990 on the file of the learned Munsif magistrate, Ponnur filed this revision petition against the order dated 1-8-1994 in C. M. A. No. 6 of 1991 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Bapatla on the ground that the lower appellate Court failed to apply its mind to the facts of the case and committed an error apparent on the face of the record.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are as follows: the plaintiff-respondent filed the suit for permanent injunction against the appellant (sic. petitioner) defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule land. It is averred that the grand-mother of the plaintiff Dasari Durgamma purchased item-2 of the plaint schedule from Y. Seetaramaiah and others under a registered sale deed dated 11-12-1964; that in 1930 she encroached upon item-1 of the plaint schedule property, after the Mathukumalli Malakondarayudu the owner migrated to tenali; that she has been in uninterrupted possession and enjoyment of the same without any objection by anybody at any time; that the adverse possession of Dasari Durgamma is evident from the revenue records; th