SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 472

D.H.NASIR, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Padmakiran Rao – Appellant
Versus
B. Venkateramana Rao – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is directed against the judgment in O. P. No. 311 of 1993 on the file of the Additional Subordinate judge, R. R. District, whereby he dismissed the petition filed jointly by the appellant and respondent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, for granting divorce. The respondent has been residing in United States since the year 1987 and it seems he is employed there. The marriage took place on 19-8-1992. Unfortunately, just within a few days after the marriage, there was disruption in marital life and estrangement between the parties. It is averred in the petition that the marriage was not consummated and the respondent left for united States on 24-8-92. One year thereafter, a joint petition was filed under sec. l3-B of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce on the basis of mutual consent. The petition was verified at Hyderabad on 20th August 1993 by both parties and it was presented on the same day. The parties were represented by the same Counsel. As required by sub-section (2) of Section 13-A, the petition was posted for enquiry on 25-6-1994 i. e. , after six months. At the enquiry the ap


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top