B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Baparowthu Nookamba – Appellant
Versus
Baparowthu Durgamba – Respondent
( 1 ) ). THIS revision petition arises against the Order dated 7-6-1995 passed in i. A. S. R. No. 525 of 1995 in O. S. No. 29 of 1985 on me file of the Court of the subordinate Judge, Amaapuram.
( 2 ) THE said Suit was filed for partition and after a long drawn battle, the parties entered into compromise by excluding some properties from partition. A memo was filed before the trial Court, which was accompanied by the terms of compromise, for recording compromise and to pass a preliminary decree in terms thereof. The lower Court recorded the compromise. However, the Office of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram called for deposit of non-judicial stamps for engrossing the decree. Then the above I. A. S. R. was filed stating mat what was sought to be passed was only a preliminary decree and not a final decree; as such, the question of payment of either Court fee or deposit of non- judicial stamps does not arise. But, the Court below did not accede to the said contention and rejected the said application; against which, this revision is preferred.
( 3 ) MR. V. L. N. Gopala Krishna Murthy, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits, that in a preliminary decree,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.