B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE proceedings arise under Section 145 Cr. P. C. and the mistake is purely that of the Court of Munsif Magistrate, West and South, Ranga Reddy and whoever was the Presiding Officer at that time he has to be blamed for the reason that had injunction been granted this problem would not have arisen and even if the injunction was refused,this problms would not have arisen. Having recorded that there is a prima facie case in favour of the petitioner in I. A. No. 513/1993 in O. S. No. l92/1993, the Court-below did not grant injunction positively, but only grantes status quo on 24-8-1993. Obviously, the lower Court did not want to state reasons either for grant of injunction or for grant of exparte injunction orders which the statutory provision mandates and has taken recourse to the easy way of granting status quo, as no reasons need to be stated and the same can be ordered in a light-hearted fashion. Litigants approach the Court of law for resolving their disputes and not for perpetuating the same. This is a case where the litigation was perpetrated instead of resolving the same as by a definite order either positive or negative these series of Section 145

Click Here to Read the rest of this document