S.R.NAYAK
United News of India, General Manager, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Bhagavanulu – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two Civil Revision Petitions arise out of two interlocutory applications filed by the plaintiff in the trial Court in the same suit. Therefore, these two Civil Revision Petitions are clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.
( 2 ) CRP No. 1954/1992 is filed by the defendants in O. S. No. 187/1990 pending on the file of the Court of the Second Asst. Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. The said suit is filed by the respondent herein namely T. S. Bhagavanulu. In the said suit, the plaintiff sought a declaration that the transfer order issued by the defendants dt. 26-12-1989 transferring him from Hyderabad to Siligiri in West bengal is void being tainted by mala fide and made in contravention of Standing orders etc. In the said suit he filed I. A. No. 261/1990 under Order XXXIX rules 1 and 2 of C. P. C. for restraining the defendants from taking further steps in pursuance of the transfer order dt. 26-12-1989. The trial Court made an order on 25-1-1990 restraining the defendants from taking any further steps in pursuance of the impugned transfer order dt. 26-12-1989. The defendants after service of summons, sought the va
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.