SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 644

S.R.NAYAK
United News of India, General Manager, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Bhagavanulu – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Civil Revision Petitions arise out of two interlocutory applications filed by the plaintiff in the trial Court in the same suit. Therefore, these two Civil Revision Petitions are clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) CRP No. 1954/1992 is filed by the defendants in O. S. No. 187/1990 pending on the file of the Court of the Second Asst. Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. The said suit is filed by the respondent herein namely T. S. Bhagavanulu. In the said suit, the plaintiff sought a declaration that the transfer order issued by the defendants dt. 26-12-1989 transferring him from Hyderabad to Siligiri in West bengal is void being tainted by mala fide and made in contravention of Standing orders etc. In the said suit he filed I. A. No. 261/1990 under Order XXXIX rules 1 and 2 of C. P. C. for restraining the defendants from taking further steps in pursuance of the transfer order dt. 26-12-1989. The trial Court made an order on 25-1-1990 restraining the defendants from taking any further steps in pursuance of the impugned transfer order dt. 26-12-1989. The defendants after service of summons, sought the va







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top