MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
G. Prakasha Rao – Appellant
Versus
District Educational Officer, Kurnool – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner was working as a Superintendent of the Church of South india Boarding Home and was appointed as Correspondent to the C. S. I. Elementary and High School, Nandikotkur from 1-6-1985 by Order dated 29-6-1985 issued by the Bishop in Rayalseema Diocese while continuing him as superintendent. The Executive Committee at its meeting held on 18-4-1995 took a policy decision not to continue the petitioner as Correspondent of the said school. The Executive Committee passed a resolution dated 21-4-1995 removing the petitioner from the post of Correspondent and the resultant vacancy be filled up by appointing Rev. M. B. Gnaneswar Rao. The District. Educational Officer, Kurnool under Rule 7 of the Grant-in-aid Code and as per the proposals received from the respondents approved the transfer of correspondent-ship of petitioner to the said Rev. M. B. Gnaneswar Rao. It is this order of approval of 1st respondent dated 6-6-1995 that is assailed in the above writ petition.
( 2 ) SRI K. V. Satyanarayana, learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the said order of approval is violative of principles of natural juslice besides being without jurisdiction an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.