SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 678

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
G. Prakasha Rao – Appellant
Versus
District Educational Officer, Kurnool – Respondent


M. H. S. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was working as a Superintendent of the Church of South india Boarding Home and was appointed as Correspondent to the C. S. I. Elementary and High School, Nandikotkur from 1-6-1985 by Order dated 29-6-1985 issued by the Bishop in Rayalseema Diocese while continuing him as superintendent. The Executive Committee at its meeting held on 18-4-1995 took a policy decision not to continue the petitioner as Correspondent of the said school. The Executive Committee passed a resolution dated 21-4-1995 removing the petitioner from the post of Correspondent and the resultant vacancy be filled up by appointing Rev. M. B. Gnaneswar Rao. The District. Educational Officer, Kurnool under Rule 7 of the Grant-in-aid Code and as per the proposals received from the respondents approved the transfer of correspondent-ship of petitioner to the said Rev. M. B. Gnaneswar Rao. It is this order of approval of 1st respondent dated 6-6-1995 that is assailed in the above writ petition.

( 2 ) SRI K. V. Satyanarayana, learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the said order of approval is violative of principles of natural juslice besides being without jurisdiction an










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top