SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 670

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, R.M.BAPAT
Rajendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Raja Ratan Gopal Sainchar – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this Contempt s Case are the respondents in Letters Patent Appeal No. 239 of 1986 which was filed against the Judgment in a first appeal. That appeal arose out of a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 28-1-1974 in respect of a building situate in premises No. 23-6-7 and 9, Shah-ali-bande. Hyderabad. The suit for specific performance was decreed by the appellate court reversing the judgment of the trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, respondents herein filed the Letters Patent Appeal. Pending the Letters Patent Appeal, the appellants (respondents herein) filed an interim application to stay the execution of the decree in O. S. No. 544 of 1975 on the file of IInd Additional Judge, City Civil Court, pursuant to the Judgment and decree dated 9-9-1986 passed in the appeal. A Division Bench of this Court stayed the execution and further ordered as follows :"however, the petitioners are directed not to alienate the house in question and also not to let out the same to tenants pending L. P. A. No. 239 of 1986. "this order was passed on 29-10-1986. It may be stated that on the date of passing of the order, respondents













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top