SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 732

S.S.HUSSAINI, M.N.RAO
MD. Azamathulla Khan – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , Finance and Planning (F. W. PRC. I) Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) WHETHER Law graduates working in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Subordinate Courts holding ministerial posts, for which a degree in Law is not a necessary qualification, are entitled to the advance increments allowed to certain other categories of State Governmentemployeesunderg. O. Ms. No. 182, finance and Planning (FW. FRC. I) Department, dated 17-7-1987, is at issue in this batch of writ petitions.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, ministerial employees working in the High Court as well as subordinate courts, all Law graduates, filed these writ petitions seeking a mandamus to the State Government to treat them at par with certain categories of employees covered by G. O. Ms. No. 182 dated 17-7-1987 for the purpose of entitlement to advance increments. Because of commonality of the questions involved for decision, we are inclined to dispose of all the writ petitions by this common judgment.

( 3 ) AMONG the High Court employees figuring as petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are Assistant Registrars, Court Officers/section Officers, Court masters, Deputy Section Officers, Assistant Section Officers, Junior Assistants, typists, Examiners etc. The rest of t







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top