( 1 ) AS in both the cases common question of law is involved since both the writ petitioners are disposed by a common order.

( 2 ) THE Petitioners are challenging the circular issued by the APSRTC (for short Corporation) issuing No. LCI /402 (16)/ dated 6-1-1990 including the deductions of notional increment already awarded to the petitioners and for consequential fixation of pay taking into account the lost notional increment and for releasing the physical monetary benefits from the date of award became enforceable.

( 3 ) FOR proper appreciation of the facts, I will narrate the facts submitted in WP No. 11182/92. The petitioner was working as a conductor in the Corporation at Sircilla Depot and subsequently his services were terminated. Aggrieved by the said termination order the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and the same was referred by the Government for adjudication in the following terms: 1. Whether the Depot Manager, Karimnagar is justified in removing Sri N. Raja Reddy, Ex-Conductor from service? 2. If not, to what relief he is entitled?the tribunal passed an award in JD No. 322/ 86 on 6-11-1987 directing the Respondent to reinstate the workman