SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 683

S.R.NAYAK
South Eastern Carriers Private Limited. – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Sarvar – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT is the plaintiff. The appellant/plaintiff filed O. S. 1337/1980 on the file of the Court of the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for recovery of Rs. 17,310/- with interest at 18% per annum from the defendants 1 to 3.

( 2 ) THE learned trial Judge by his judgment and decree dt. 3-11-1983 decreed the suit only against the defendants 1 and 2 and dismissed the suit as against the defendant No. 3. The defendants 1 and 2 remained exparte before the trial Court. The judgment and decree of the trial Court in so far it decreed the suit as against the defendants 1 and 2 became final in the absence of any challenge by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Hence, this appeal is by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree, referred to above, passed by the trial Court only in so far it dismissed the suit as against the defendant No. 3. The defendant No. 3 is the respondent in this appeal.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff s case is as follows:- The plaintiff is a company registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act and has its registered office at Calcutta. The plaintiff is a carrier. It is pleaded that the plaintiff in its own right and in its own acc


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top