SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 762

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
D.Lakshmana Rao - Appellant
Versus
D.Kamala Bai - Respondent
Decided On : 11-03-95

A divorced woman is entitled to maintenance under sub-section (1) of Section 125 Cr. P. C. if she is unable to maintain herself.

Headnote:

MAINTENANCE - SECTION 125 CR. P. C. - DIVORCED WIFE - ENTITLEMENT TO MAINTENANCE - SECTION 125 (4) CR. P. C. - NOT APPLICABLE - DIVORCED WOMAN ENTITLED TO MAINTENANCE UNDER SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 125 CR. P. C. IF UNABLE TO MAINTAIN HERSELF.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a divorced husband, filed a petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. to quash an order granting maintenance to his divorced wife under Section 125 Cr. P. C. The petitioner contended that since the divorce was granted on the ground of desertion by the wife, she was not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. and that there was no evidence to prove that he had sufficient means to maintain her.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. is not applicable to a divorced woman, and that a divorced woman is entitled to maintenance under sub-section (1) of Section 125 Cr. P. C. if she is unable to maintain herself. The court also found that the petitioner had sufficient means to maintain his wife and dismissed the petition.

Issues: 1. Whether a divorced wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr. P. C. 2. Whether Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. is applicable to a divorced woman.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. A divorced woman is entitled to maintenance under sub-section (1) of Section 125 Cr. P. C. if she is unable to maintain herself. 2. Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. is not applicable to a divorced woman.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed.

V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE 1st respondent who is the divorced wife of the petitioner, filed MC. No. 3 of 1992 on the file of the of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni claiming maintenance at Rs. 500. 00 per month. The learned Magistrate granted Rs. 400. 00 per month and in Crl. R. P. No. 44 of 1994 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool, the amount of Rs. 400. 00 has been modified and reduced to Rs. 300. 00 per month. The Petitioner filed this petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. to quash the order in R. C. No. 3 of 1992 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni as modified by the Appellate court in the above revision.

( 2 ) THE counsel for the petitioner contends that the 1st respondent having been divorced by a valid decree of divorce on the ground that she has deserted the petitioner is not entitled under sub-section (4) of Section 125 Cr. P. C. for claiming maintenance and that there is no evidence on record to prove that the petitioner had sufficient means to maintain the wife.

( 3 ) THE counsel for the 1st respondent has raised an objection that the proceedings under Section 482 Cr. P. C. are only initiated since the petitioner was prohibited, by the legal bar under Section 397 (2) Cr. P. C. from filing a 2nd revision after he failed before the Sessions Court.

( 4 ) IT is true that Section 397 (2) Cr. P. C. prohibits the same party from filing a 2nd revision in the High Court. The Supreme Court in Dharampal v. Ramshri, AIR 1993 SC 1361 held that a 2nd revision by the party cannot be entertained under Section 482 Cr. P. C. as it was well settled that the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code cannot be utilised for exercising the powers which are expressly barred by the Code. However, in a recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Ganesh Narayan Hegde v. S. Bangarappa, 1995 (4) SCC 41 it has been held that Section 482 Cr. P. C. is not a bar for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court on the mere ground that a 2nd revision is prohibited under Section 397 (2) Cr. P. C. and that both the Sections operate in two different fields. However, the learned Judges cautioned in that decision that the power under Section 482 Cr. P. C. being an extra ordinary jurisdiction to correct any abuse of process of Court can be exercised in a given set of circumstances, if the Court finds that its inherent powers should be exercised to prevent abuse of process of the Court. I, therefore, cannot throw out this petition at the threshold. it is, therefore, necessary to see whether the provisions under Section 482 Cr. P. C. are invoked in this case to circumvent the provisions of Section 397 (2) Cr. P. C. to convert this Court as a Second Revisional Court. The petitioner has raised before me the same questions that have been raised before the Courts below. Those questions have been considered by the Courts below and were rejected upon a consideration of all the facts of the case. Hence, this petition can be held to be as having been filed to circumvent the provisions of Section 397 (2) Cr. P. C. and, therefore, this petition can be dismissed on that short ground. However, in view of the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, I proceed to deal with the same. The contention that a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion by the wife, having been validly obtained, Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. cannot be made applicable to the facts of the case, in my view, is misconceived. Under Section 125 (1) Cr. P. C. , a wife is entitled for maintenance if she is unable to maintain herself. Under Explanation (b), a divorced woman is included in the term wife . It, therefore, follows that even a divorced woman is entitled for maintenance if she is unable to maintain herself. Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. cannot be read as including the divorced woman, in its operation. Section 125 (4) Cr. P. C. is only applicable to a woman who is a wife not a divorced woman. In this connection, in a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top