P. S. MISHRA, C. J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the appellant. Going by the principle laid down in J. M. Desai vs. Roshan Kumar1 it has to be held on the facts of mis case that learned Single Judge has committed error is not dismissing the writ petition on the ground that petitioner-respondents 1and 2 have no locus standi to challenge the grant of permit to the appellant herein to run a stage carriage on the route specified in the permit. Locus is determined by knowing whether the person who has moved the Court is aggrieved or not and in the judgment aforementioned it has been pointed out mat the test is to find out,whether any interest of the petitioner is injured. Those whose interests or rights are violated clearly fall in the category of persons aggrieved. Those, however, whose rights or interests are not at all in jeopardy are none other than interlopers to serve some interest which is not legally available to them or sometimes wrongly claiming to champion the cause of the public at large. The Supreme Court in the above judgment has also pointed out the grey area where a person for certain causes can be a person aggrieved eventhough none of his personal interests or rights

Click Here to Read the rest of this document