SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 928

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.MISHRA
C. Balaiah – Appellant
Versus
Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams. Tirupathi,rep. by its Executive Officer – Respondent


P. S. MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals under Clause 15 of thy Letters Patent of the Court have arisen from a common Judgment in Writ Petition Nos. 4967 and 10492 of 1992 being proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petitioner - appellants (in W. A. No. 1202 of 1995) have sought for a direction to the respondents in the writ petition to appoint them as Assistant Engineers (Electrical) in accordance with Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanarms Service rules, since they have been working as Line Inspectors arid were eligibly for such appointment by promotion. Writ petitioner - appellants (in Writ Appeal no. 1203 of 1995) have sought for an appropriate Writ to declare G. O. Ms. No. 375, Revenue (End. III) Department, dated 26-4-1994, as illegal and unconstitutional and accordingly to set aside the consequential order in Roc, no. TLI/38679/92, dated 4-5-1994, issued by the second respondent appointing the third respondent in the writ petition as Assistant Engineer (Electrical ).

( 2 ) WRIT Petitioner-appellants, it is not in dispute, were appointed as NMRs since 1986-87. They fulfilled the requisite qualifications and worked in the work charged establishment. According t















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top