SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 896

V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Meesa Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Eruvaka Building, Khairatabad, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PETITION under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the High Court will be pleased to quash the orders passed by the First Respondent in E. P. No. 6/94 in C. D. No. 51/93 on 3. 12. 1994. These petitions coming on for hearing upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. V. Rama Sharma, Advocate in both and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3 and of Mr. P. Bhaskar Mohan, Advocate for the Respondents 4 to 10 in Crl. P. No. 3809/94 and Respondent No. 4 in Criminal Procedure 3810/94, the Court made the following Order :-

( 2 ) CRL. P. No. 3809/94 is filed to quash the order, dated 3. 12. 1994 in E. P. No. 5/94 in C. D. No. 84/93 on the file of the A. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short, state Commission ). Crl. P. No. 3810/94 is filed to quash the order, dated 3. 12. 1994 in E. P. No. 6/94 in C. D. No. 51/93 on the file of the state Commission. In both the cases the petitioner is common and is the opposite party No. 8 in the above C. Ds. The State Commission disposed of both the C. Ds. by a common order dated 7. 6. 1994



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top