V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Meesa Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Eruvaka Building, Khairatabad, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITION under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the High Court will be pleased to quash the orders passed by the First Respondent in E. P. No. 6/94 in C. D. No. 51/93 on 3. 12. 1994. These petitions coming on for hearing upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. V. Rama Sharma, Advocate in both and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3 and of Mr. P. Bhaskar Mohan, Advocate for the Respondents 4 to 10 in Crl. P. No. 3809/94 and Respondent No. 4 in Criminal Procedure 3810/94, the Court made the following Order :-
( 2 ) CRL. P. No. 3809/94 is filed to quash the order, dated 3. 12. 1994 in E. P. No. 5/94 in C. D. No. 84/93 on the file of the A. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short, state Commission ). Crl. P. No. 3810/94 is filed to quash the order, dated 3. 12. 1994 in E. P. No. 6/94 in C. D. No. 51/93 on the file of the state Commission. In both the cases the petitioner is common and is the opposite party No. 8 in the above C. Ds. The State Commission disposed of both the C. Ds. by a common order dated 7. 6. 1994
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.