SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 1036

S.S.M.QUADRI, V.BHASKARA RAO
K. Ramanjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
Stage-2 Officer, Kotanka Gram Panchayat – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) K. RAMANJANEYULU (the petitioner herein) contested for the post of Sarpanch of Kotanka Gram Panchayat. That post is reserved for B. C. Category. The election for the said post was scheduled to be conducted on 24-6-1995. At the stage of counting, it appears, (1285) votes have been polled, out of which the petitioner secured (623) votes and C. Subrahmanyam (the fourth respondent herein), the other contestant, secured (599) votes. Form No. 17 was thus filled in but the result of the counting was not announced. It is stated that a representation was filed before the second respondent by some villagers belongingto Scheduled Caste on26-6-1995. The second respondent direcled the Revenue Divisional Officer to conduct an enquiry into the allegations made in the said representation. Accordingly, on the next day i. e, 27-6-1995 the Mandal Revenue Officer conducted an enquiry and opined that no case for repelling was made out. It is alleged that without waiting for the report of the Mandal Revenue Officer, the second respondent sent fax message to the third respondent on 28-6-1995 requesting him to order repoll for the entire Gram Panchayat on the ground tha






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top