SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 1024

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.MISHRA
Yeruva Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent


P. S. MISHRA, C. J.

( 1 ) LEARNED single Judge has rejected the writ petition primarily on the ground that the lessee from the endowment concerned has ceased to have renewal and thus there is a deemed surrender of the lease by him. Learned Counsel for the appellant has seriously questioned the above said findings. Before, however, we give our reasons why do we not deem it necessary to go into all sorts of the questions the learned Counsel for the appellant is trying to raise in the instant appeal particularly when there is no issue before us that notwithstanding the provisions of the A. P. Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, the A. P. Tenancy Act shall apply because the lease concerned has been an agricultural lease, we may recapitulate broadly the facts upon which the appellant has laid his claim and filed the instant writ petition.

( 2 ) THE appellant, it is not in dispute, got a lease for a period of six years of a parcel of land. He got a renewal for another six years. He applied for a further renewal. The authorities, however, of the endowment concerned have decided to settle the land by auction. There is some mention that the appellant has pa




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top