SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 108

J.ESWARA PRASAD, V.BHASKARA RAO
Samineni Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
Nagubandi Venkata Narasiah (died) – Respondent


ESWARA PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned single Judge in A. S. No. 1936 of 1988, dismissing the appeal filed by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in the suit laid for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 11-9-75.

( 2 ) DEFENDANTS 1 and 2 executed an agreement of sale dated 11-9-75 in favour of the plaintiffs agreeing to convey the plaint schedule property in an extent of Ac. 1-20 guntas of land situated in S. No. 766 at Kedada by executing a registered sate deed and agreeing to deliver possession of the land. The sale consideration was fixed at Rupees 1,10,000/- and the plaintiffs paid a sum of Rs. 40,000. 00 towards advance and the balance was agreed to be paid within three months thereafter. It was stipulated that the defendants should satisfy the plaintiffs about their title to the property and that it is also unencumbered. While so, the third defendant issued a notice dated 30-11-1975 to the first plaintiff and to first defendant, who is the brother of the third defendant, through a counsel disputing the title in himself. On receipt of the said notice, the plaintiffs approached defendants 1 and 2 and requested them to resolve the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top