B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14-2-1990 passed by the District Revenue Officer in his proceedings No. B2/8102/89. The District Revenue Officer is the 1st respondent while the 2nd respondent is the person at whose instance the said impugned order has been passed. The 2nd respondent had filed a petition for correction of revenue records before the 1st respondent The 1st respondent did not conduct any enquiry on his own, but called for a report of the Mandal Revenue Officer and accepted the case of the 2nd respondent and directed the correction of the revenue records. The writ petitioner states that the same was ex parte without notice to him and without conducting any enquiry and contending so, he filed a petition to set aside the order dated 14-6-1988. But the same was rejected by order dated 31-8-1989. The petitioner then filed a review petition before the 1st respondent pleading several grounds. The copy of the review petition is filed among the material papers. It is stated that the review petition is still pendingconsideration and that is obvious from a reading of, the impugned order dated 14-2-1990. The said order is,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document