Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, R.M.BAPAT
Pubi Satyanarayana alias Satteyya - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Crl. A. No. 536/93
Decided On : 03-31-94
Advocates Appeared :
M/s. M.Lakshmana Sarma, A.S.Venkatesh
HELD: When cross-examination is deferred and when it is done on a subsequent version of the witnesses contradicts with the earlier version In the instant case, the part played by the Advocate in not being present for the cross-examination and the witnesses turning hostile in a wholesale manner makes that it is a clear case of manipulation by the party in collusion with the Advocate with an intention to get acquittal Under such circumstances, it is the duty of the Court to take the earliest version given by the witnesses as correct basing on the material available on record or from the evidence of either investigating officer or subsequent witnesses
Where the witnesses state on oath in the court in the first instance and after taking adjournment on some pretext, the witnesses turn hostile, it is nothing but blatant manipulation of evidence, it is the duty of the court in such cases to proceed for prejury against the persons concerned
( 2 ) P. W. 13 the Sub-Inspector of Police, Indrajavaram Police Station received Ex. P-1 and Ex. P-10 on 4-4-1991 from the Tanuku Police Station and registered it as Crime No. 23 of 1991 under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code and issued F. I. R. , Ex. P-11. He went to the hospital, examined P. W. 1 and P. W. 4, and seized the blood-stained clothes M. Os. 3 to 5 under the cover of mediator s report Ex. P-2. He also visited the scene of offence and examined the same in the presence of meditors and prepared Ex. P-3. He also prepared the sketch of scene of offence Ex. P-12 and seized M. Os. 1, 2 and 6. He examined P. Ws. 2, 3, 5 and others. On 7-4-1991, he received intimation of the death Ex. P-13 of the deceased and altered the section of law into one under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and issued F. I. R. , Ex. P-14. P. W. 14 - the Circle Inspector, Tanuku, received the copy of Ex. P.-14 on 7-4-1991 and took up investigation. He held inquest over the dead body of the deceased in the presence of P. W. 7 and another and prepared an inquest report-Ex. P-4. The dead body of the deceased was sent for post mortem examination and P. W. 9 - the Deputy Civil Surgeon conducted the post mortem examination and found nine external injuries. On internal examination, he found fracture of front and temporal bones and cerebellum diffused. The Surgeon opined that the patient died of shock and haemorrhage due to multiple injuries. He issued Ex. P-5 post mortem certificate. The accused was arrested on 6-4-1991 by the Sub-Inspector of Police and sent him for remand and after completing the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed.
( 3 ) THE learned Judge believed the version that has been spoken to by the direct witnesses, in particular P. Ws. 1, and 4 and came to the conclusion that the prosecution has made out the case beyond all reasonable doubt, which ultimately resulted in convicting the accused for offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and sentencing to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. It is against this conviction, the accused-appellant fil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.