SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 154

P.L.N.SHARMA
Belgees Begum etc – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


NARASIMHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions have been posted before me for orders.

( 2 ) THESE matters arise in the following circumstances:-- These two writ petitions along with Seven Civil Revision Petitions raise a common point. These matters were heard by late G. V. L. Narasimha Rao, J. It is admitted before me by counsel on either side that their arguments were heard by the learned Judge and judgments in both the writ petitions were dictated in open Court to the Court Master on 4-11-1993 and 6-11-1993 respectively. But before they were transcribed and placed before the learned Judge for signature, the learned Judge unfortunately passed away.

( 3 ) THE Registrar (Judl.) verified and also recorded the statements of the Court Officers, who attended the Court on the respective dates, and found that the Judgments were dictated in open Court to the Court-master by the learned Judge on the respective dates, but by the time they were transcribed and placed before the learned Judge for signature, the learned Judge Passed away on 7-11-1993. As stated above, the counsel on either side who appeared before the learned Judge and argued the matters also admitted that the cases were argu













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top