SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 219

A.GOPAL RAO
Vanimisatti Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Jayavarapu Krishna Murty – Respondent


A. GOPAL RAO, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 2 and 4 to 6 in Original Suit No. 65 of 1984, on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Kovvur, West Godavari, are the appellants in this appeal. Respondents 1 and 2 herein are the plaintiffs in that suit. That suit was filed by the plaintiffs for (a) specific performance of the suit agreement of sale dated 31-8-1981, executed by the 1st defendant for himself and on behalf of the minor-2nd defendant in favour of plaintiffs 1 and 2 for Rs. l,02,900. 00 agreeing to sell the house property with site bearing Door No. 53, in the Temple Street, in 10th Ward of Jangareddigudem, Polavaram Taluk, West Godavari District; (b) for recovery of a sum of Rs. 10,000. 00 towards damages for the diala-tary tactics adopted by the defendant in completing the sale transaction in time; (c) alternatively for a decree for refund of Rs. 78,900. 00; (d) for. a further sum of Rs. 1,00,000. 00 as damages for breach of con- tract and also for a declaration that the 3rd defendant, who is a subsequent-purchaser of a part of the suit schedule property from defendants 1 and 2 under a registered sate deed dated 10-12-1987, is not a bona fide purchaser for value and that the said






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top