S.PARVATHA RAO
Satyanna Goud – Appellant
Versus
Excise Superintendent Mahboobnagar – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Petitioners in these four Writ petitions question the order bearing Rc. No. B2/7501/93 dated 16-2-1994 of the 1st respondent herein i. e. the Excise superintendent, Mahabubnagar, whereunder the T. F. T licences of the petitioners among others have been suspended.
( 2 ) AS the facts and questions arising are more or less common, these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.
( 3 ) THE three petitioners (1, 2 and 3) in writ Petition No. 2728 of 1994 are T. F. T. licence holders for counters Nos. 15,16 and 17 respectively in respect of Kishtareddipet village toddy shop which is under T. F. T. Scheme and their licences are for a period of 5 yearsfrom 1-10-1992 to 30-9-1997.
( 4 ) IN the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, these facts are admitted. But it is further stated that one Masanna Goud son of Chandraiah holds T. F. T. licence in respect of Counter No. 14 of the said T. F. T shophe is not before this court in any of the writ petitions.
( 5 ) THE two petitioners (1 and 2) in writ Petition Nos. 2973 are the T. F. T. licence holders in respect of Counter Nos. 7 and 9 of rangapur village toddy shop which is also under the T. F.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.