SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 206

S.PARVATHA RAO
Satyanna Goud – Appellant
Versus
Excise Superintendent Mahboobnagar – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioners in these four Writ petitions question the order bearing Rc. No. B2/7501/93 dated 16-2-1994 of the 1st respondent herein i. e. the Excise superintendent, Mahabubnagar, whereunder the T. F. T licences of the petitioners among others have been suspended.

( 2 ) AS the facts and questions arising are more or less common, these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.

( 3 ) THE three petitioners (1, 2 and 3) in writ Petition No. 2728 of 1994 are T. F. T. licence holders for counters Nos. 15,16 and 17 respectively in respect of Kishtareddipet village toddy shop which is under T. F. T. Scheme and their licences are for a period of 5 yearsfrom 1-10-1992 to 30-9-1997.

( 4 ) IN the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, these facts are admitted. But it is further stated that one Masanna Goud son of Chandraiah holds T. F. T. licence in respect of Counter No. 14 of the said T. F. T shophe is not before this court in any of the writ petitions.

( 5 ) THE two petitioners (1 and 2) in writ Petition Nos. 2973 are the T. F. T. licence holders in respect of Counter Nos. 7 and 9 of rangapur village toddy shop which is also under the T. F.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top