SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 203

B.S.RAIKOTE, S.S.M.QUADRI
Carew Phipson Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, Secunderabad – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. It seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to refund a sum of Rs. 15,70,117 being the amount refundable for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1989-90 pursuant to the order of the respondent dated 3/03/1990 and 16/08/1991 respectively with interest, under section 33-E of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short "the Act" ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a dealer under the APGST Act. It is stated that for the year 1984-85, a sum of Rs. 14,46,251 became refundable to the petitioner by virtue of the order of assessment dated 3/03/1990 and for the year 1989-90, a sum of Rs. 2,41,705 became refundable in view of the order of assessment dated 16/08/1991. In so far as the assessment year 1984-85 is concerned, the petitioner filed an application on 21/03/1990, for refund of the amount due to it. It is stated by the respondent that the amount due for the years 1985-86 and 1988-89 amounting to Rs. 75,437 was adjusted. The petitioner says that by virtue of the order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner for the year 1981-82, the petitioner has to pay a further sum of Rs

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top