SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 190

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
United India Insurance Company Ltd. , Kurnool – Appellant
Versus
Mediga Thappeta Ramakka – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE four appeals are preferred by the United India Insurance Company Limited, respondent No. 3 in the lower court, challenging the judgments of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurnool dated 11/09/1989, passed in C. P. Nos. 208, 206, 207, and 205 of 1988, awarding various amounts of compensation in favour of the claimants in each petition.

( 2 ) WHILE the petitioners in the first three appeals, viz. , CM. As. 1988,1989 and 1990 of 1989 are the legal representatives or dependants of the respective deceased, the petitioner concerned in C. M. A. No. 1991 of 1989 is the injured person.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioners in all the appeals is that on the date of incident (i. e. 6-5-1988) at about 10-00 a. m. when the deceased persons, the injured petitioner Ramakka and others were waiting by the side of the road near a culvert at Kanala village to board a bus to get to a shandy, the tractor driven by the 1st respondent, loaded with stones, came at a high speed and dashed against the deceased and the injured petitioner, as a result of which the deceased died and the petitioner Ramakka received injuries. The petitioners have also examined one V. Thirmmann









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top