MOTILAL B.NAIK
Pidathala Ranga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kurnool Municipality – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A. S. No. 79 of 1985 dated 9-12-1987 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, kurnool.
( 2 ) THE first appellant (since died) was the plaintiff in the suit who filed the same against the respondent-Municipality seeking a declaration that the proposed enhancement of house tax from Rs. 891-52 ps. per half year to Rs. 3209- 50 ps. per half year for the building D. No. 40/317-D Kurnool is illegal and void and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from collecting the enhanced tax.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff, the building isused for non-residential purpose as a hotel. It was assessed to tax half yearly for Rs. 891 -50 ps on an annual rental value of Rs. 5,600/ -. While so, the defendant-Municipality issued a special notice dated 22-3-1982 proposing to enhance the tax to Rs. 3566. 10 ps. per half year. As against the said notice, the plaintiff preferred a revision petition before the Municipal Authority. The defendant-Municipality reduced the tax from Rs. 3566. 10ps. to Rs. 3209/-per half year. It is the case of the plaintiff that there was no addition or improvement to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.