SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 427

MOTILAL B.NAIK
Botchina Tavitayya – Appellant
Versus
Adapalli Venkatapathi Raju – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is the claimant in MAOP No. 94 of 1988 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Srikakulam. His case is that he is a resident of Karlam village, Cheepurupalli Mandal, Vizianagaram District. On 21-9-1987, he was returning from the sea after conducting fishing operations in order to go to his village. A lorry, bearing No. APH 6975, driven by the first respondent, in a rash and negligent manner, came at a high speed without blowing the horn, and dashed against the petitioner at the Coast Junction near Ranastalam Police Station around 2-30 P. M. Due to the said accident, he lost both his legs. He was taken to the Government Headquarters Hospital, Srikakulam, for treatment land amputation of his legs. He claimed a total compensation of rupees two lakhs under various heads, namely, (1) transportation to the hospital and medicines: Rs. 10,000/-; (2) Compensation for pain and suffering: Rs. 10,000/-; (3) Compensation for disfigurement: Rs. 5,000/-; (4) Compensation for loss of earnings: Rs. 1, 25,000/-; and (5) Compensation for loss of amenities: rs. 50,000/ -. The case of the appellant is that he is a fisherman and was eking out his liveli








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top