SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 411

M.N.RAO, N.D.PATNAIK
Kondaplli Seetharamyya – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


N. D. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, Sri Kondapalli Seetharamayya, who was accused in Crime No. 1 of 1993, Investigation Cell, Intelligence, Hyderabad, registered under Sections 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short TADA) and Section 8 of A. P. Public Security Act, was arrested on 20th March, 1993 at Anamanapudi village, Krishna district. Subsequently he was produced before the designated Court, i. e. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad and remanded to Judicial custody and is now lodged in the Central Jail, Musheerabad, Secunderabad. On 19-3-1994 a charge sheet was filed against him along with two others under Sections 3 and 4 of TADA Act and Section 8 of the A. P. Public Security Act in the Court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad which is the designated Court under the TADA Act. The designated Court had taken cognizance of the case and registered it as Sessions Case No. 130 of 1994 and made over to the IV Additional Sessions Judge, which is also a designated Court under the TADA Act. On 23-3-1994 another charge-sheet was filed against the petitioner and other accused for offences under Section 120-B, I. P. C. , read w



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top