SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 477

MOTILAL B.NAIK, S.S.M.QUADRI
Pinakini Seeds – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS tax revision case is filed under section 22 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (for short "the State Act"), by the assessee being dissatisfied with the order of the Tribunal in Tax Appeal No. 490 of 1984 dated 27/10/1987.

( 2 ) THE short but interesting question that arises for consideration in this revision, is whether the exemption granted by the State Government under section 9 (1) of the State Act qualifies for exemption under section 8 (2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act (for short "the Central Act" ).

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a registered dealer in seeds both under the State Act as well as the Central Act. It claimed exemption on the turnover of the seeds as inter-State sales under the Central Act. The assessing authority held that he was not entitled to exemption. The petitioner unsuccessfully appealed before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Guntur. The second appeal filed before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal having been rejected, it came up in revision to this Court.

( 4 ) SRI P. Srinivasa Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that the two requirements of G. O. Ms. No. 604, Rev. (S)
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top