Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : M.N.RAO, S.V.MARUTHI
Good Year India Limited - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 10-20-94
ANDHRA PRADESH GENERAL SALES TAX ACT, 1957 - SCHEDULE I, ENTRY 101 - SCHEDULE IV, ENTRY 5 - TRANSMISSION BELTING - EXEMPTION FROM TAX - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - CONFLICT BETWEEN SPECIAL AND GENERAL PROVISIONS - SPECIAL PROVISION PREVAILS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Goodyear India Limited, challenged the assessment of tax on the turnover relating to sales of transmission belting for the assessment year 1986-87, contending that the goods fall under the exempted category of cotton fabrics under Entry 5 of Schedule IV of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that after the insertion of Entry 101 in Schedule I of the Act, transmission belting became specifically exigible to tax at the point of first sale in the State, and the exemption under Entry 5 of Schedule IV no longer applied.
Issues: Whether transmission belting falls under the exempted category of cotton fabrics under Entry 5 of Schedule IV of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, or is subject to tax under Entry 101 of Schedule I.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle that when there is a conflict between a special provision and a general provision, the special provision prevails. Entry 101 of Schedule I specifically includes transmission belting as an item subject to tax, while Entry 5 of Schedule IV provides a general exemption for cotton fabrics. Therefore, Entry 101 prevails, and transmission belting is subject to tax.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the transmission belting was liable to tax under Entry 101 of Schedule I and the petitioner was not entitled to claim exemption under Entry 5 of Schedule IV.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a registered dealer under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. For the assessment year 1986-87 the Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, Abids, inter alia, assessed the petitioner to a tax of Rs. 4,85,657. 96, in respect of a turnover of Rs. 44,93,632. 68, representing the first sales of transmission relating treating the same as exigible to tax under entry 101, clause (iv) of Schedule I to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. The prescribed rate was 10. 45 per cent for the period from 1/04/198 6/07/1986 and for the period 1/08/1986 to 31/03/1987, the rate was II per cent. The tax levied in respect of the aforesaid turnover was inclusive of surcharge and additional tax.
( 3 ) IN this writ petition it is contended that the goods in question-transmission belting-fall under entry 5 of Schedule IV, which specifies the goods exempted from the purview of the tax under the Act.
( 4 ) SHRI Ramakrishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that in State of A. P. v. Goodyear India Ltd. [1989] 74 STC 47 a Division Bench of this Court held that transmission belting are cotton fabrics falling within the ambit of entry 5 of Schedule IV and so not liable to tax. The assessing authority, according to the learned counsel, committed an error in treating the turnover relatable to transmission belting as liable to tax under entry 101 of Schedule I. In opposition to this, Mr. Suresh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, says that the judgment of the Division Bench referred to supra, has no application after the entry 101 was inserted in Schedule I to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, under which transmission belting are one of the specified items exigible to tax at the point of first sale in the State.
( 5 ) SCHEDULE I to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act specified the goods in respect of which tax is leviable at the point of first sale in the State. Entry 101 was inserted for the first time by Act 49 of 1976 with effect from 1/09/1976. It reads, in so far as it is relevant, as follows : "101. Rubber products (other than those specifically mentioned elsewhere), including - (i ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ii ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iii ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iv) transmission, conveyer or elevator belts or belting material of vulcanized rubber, whether combined with any textile material or otherwise. " Schedule IV of the Act specifies the goods which are exempted from tax. Entry 5 of this Schedule reads : "cotton fabrics, rayon or artificial silk fabrics and woollen fabrics".
( 6 ) IN the State of A. P. v. Goodyear India Ltd. [1989] 74 STC 47 (AP), the case in which the present petitioner figured as respondent, the question for consideration was whether transmission belting were cotton fabrics falling within the anibit of entry 5 of Schedule IV, i. e. , exempted goods. The Division Bench after taking into consideration that transmission beltings contain 66. 7 per cent cotton and the remaining 33. 3 per cent rubber, and so continue to be cotton fabrics subjected to a process of rubberising held that, the view taken by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal that the transmission beatings are cotton fabrics, was correct. That case pertained to the assessment year 1975-76 when entry 101 of Schedule I fit in statute book. After entry 101 was inserted in Schedule I the position has as changed. The transmission beltings are one of the items specifically covered by entry 101 of Schedule I and so exigible to tax at the prescribed rate at the point of first sale in the State. It is settled law [vide Sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.