SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 465

S.V.MARUTHI, M.N.RAO
Boya Chinna Subbarayudu – Appellant
Versus
Collector and District Magistrate, Kurnool – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, Boya Chinna Subbarayudu, is challenging in this writ petition the order passed by the District Collector and District Magistrate, Kurnool, the first respondent herein, on 13-7-1994 in Re. C1/2317/m/94 by which one Boya Naidu O. Boya Savenehu, the brother of the petitioner, was detained under section 3 (2) of Act 1 of 1986 (A. P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986) "with a view to prevent the detenu from further acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. " The State Government has confirmed the order of the District Collector and the Advisory Board has expressed the opinion after hearing the petitioner that in its opinion there is sufficient cause for the detention of the detenu in question. The period of detention as fixed by the Government under section 12 is one year with effect from the date of detention.

( 2 ) IN support of the order of the detention, two grounds are mentioned by the detaining authority, a copy of which was supplied to the detenu. The two grounds are : 1. On 1- the Enforcement Squad led by Excise In












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top