SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 459

P.L.N.SHARMA, B.S.RAIKOTE
T. Sriramulu – Appellant
Versus
Diwan Eknathrao – Respondent


P. L. N. SARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision filed by the tenant arises under the Andhra Pradesh buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control act 1960, for short "the Act".

( 2 ) WE will refer to the parties in this Judgment as original landlord, landlord and tenant for convenience sake.

( 3 ) EVICTION petition was instituted by the original landlord (father of the landlord) on the ground that the schedule premises is required bona fide for the business of his son (landlord) to commence cloth business. It is stated in the application for eviction that the original landlord is the kartha of Hindu Undivided Family, consisting of himself and two sons (including landlord ). The joint family possesses property including the petition schedule shop. His son diwan Vijaykumar, aged about 22 years (landlord) is carrying on business under the name and style of "vijaya bangle Store" in a rented mulgi bearing Municipal No. 1-1-258/3 belonging to Sn U. Narayana, situate at Chik- kadapalli, Hyderabad. He is pressing the original landlord to provide him petition schedule mulgi belonging to the joint family to commence cloth business on the ground that his bangle business is not profitable and suitable w
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top