SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 552

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : LINGARAJA RATH
M.V.Thimma Reddy - Appellant
Versus
Special Tahsildar, Land Refonns, Kurnool - Respondent
Decided On : 11-28-94

The proviso to Section 7 (5) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Amendment Act, 1977 is an exception to the generality of Section 7 (5) and has no wider sweep or application. The proviso operates only to restrict the operation of the substantive provision to which it is a rider.

Headnote:

LAND REFORMS - CEILING ON AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS - RE-TRANSFER OF LAND - APPLICABILITY OF PROVISO TO SECTION 7 (5) OF THE ANDHRA PRADESH LAND REFORMS (CEILING ON AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS) AMENDMENT ACT 1977 - SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who were owners of agricultural land, had their land vested in the Government under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (the Principal Act). Subsequently, the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Amendment Act, 1977 (the Amendment Act) was enacted, which increased the ceiling limit for agricultural holdings. As a result, the petitioners became entitled to the re-transfer of their land under Section 7 (5) of the Amendment Act. However, the District Collector refused to re-transfer the land to the petitioners, relying on the proviso to Section 7 (5), which states that the land shall not be re-transferred if the District Collector considers that the resumption of such land is likely to cause undue hardship to the allottee or transferee thereof.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the proviso to Section 7 (5) of the Amendment Act is an exception to the generality of Section 7 (5) and has no wider sweep or application. The proviso operates only to restrict the operation of the substantive provision to which it is a rider. The court further held that the applicability of Section 7 (5) is limited to situations arising because of the applicability of the Amendment Act to the Principal Act. It does not apply where a person has become entitled to retransfer not in accordance with the applicability of the Amendment Act to the principal Act but, as is in the present case, where the re-transfer is directed because of a re-classification of the lands showing that the petitioners had no surplus land even under the unamended Principal Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the proviso to Section 7 (5) of the Amendment Act applies to all cases of re-transfer of land vested in the Government under the Principal Act? 2. Whether the petitioners are entitled to the re-transfer of their land under Section 7 (5) of the Amendment Act, despite the fact that the District Collector has reported that the resumption of such land is likely to cause undue hardship to the allottee or transferee thereof?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The proviso to Section 7 (5) of the Amendment Act is an exception to the generality of Section 7 (5) and has no wider sweep or application. The proviso operates only to restrict the operation of the substantive provision to which it is a rider. 2. The applicability of Section 7 (5) is limited to situations arising because of the applicability of the Amendment Act to the Principal Act. It does not apply where a person has become entitled to retransfer not in accordance with the applicability of the Amendment Act to the principal Act but, as is in the present case, where the re-transfer is directed because of a re-classification of the lands showing that the petitioners had no surplus land even under the unamended Principal Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith re-transfer the land to the petitioner.

LINGARAJA RATH, J.

( 1 ) THIS case raises an interesting question regarding applicability of the proviso to Section 7 (5) of the Andhra pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Amendment Act 1977 (Act no. X of 1977) (hereinafter referred to as the amendment Act ) to restoration of surplus land vested in the Government under the unamended Principal compensation in respect

( 2 ) ACCORDING to explanation 1 (a) to section 10 of the Act, a female member of the family unit cannot be required to surrender anything in excess of her proportionate share. There have, however, been persistent representations for removing the above restriction and for leaving the choice of the lands to be surrendered to the members of the family. It is, therefore, proposed to amend the above provision of the Act suitably to permit surrenders in excess of the proportionate share by the female members. 3. According to Section 3 of the Act, the expression owner has been defined so as to include a person entitled to a vested remainder. Hence, lands to which a person is entitled as a vested remainder are to be clubbed with the lands which he may separately own and both together will comprise his holding. It has been represented that this provision works hardship in cases where the limited owner is not a surplus holder consequent on his own holding and the land to which he is entitled as a vested remainder being aggregated together. It is, therefore, proposed to amend the definition of the term owner in the Act so us to exclude a reference to a person entitled to vested remainder . 4. It is also proposed to amend Section 18 of the Act in order to exempt the lands which are acquired or taken on lease by industries solely for non-agricultural purposes, as such difficulty is being felt by industries in acquiring agricultural land specifically for non-agricultural purposes such as for construction of factory buildings, et cetera. 5. The Bill seeks to give effect to the above proposals. ""7. Special Provisions for cases affected by the provisions of the Principal Act as amended by this Act :- Notwithstanding anything in the Principal Act, (1) Where, in any case to which the provisions of the Principal Act as amended by this Act are applicable, the tribunal has determined under Section 9 of the Principal Act, the extent of land in excess of the ceiling area (hereafter in this section referred to as "the excess land") before the date on which assent of the president to this Act is first published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette (hereafter in this Section referred to as "the said date") to a proceeding in respect thereof under section 10 of the Principal Act is pending before the tribunal on the said date, the tribunal may, suo motu and shall, on an application made in this behalf by any person affected, determine the excess land under Section 9 of the Principal Act afresh, or approve a surrender of the excess land by the person concerned afresh, or as the case may be, select the land to be surrendered, under Section 10 of the Principal Act afresh, in accordance with the provisions of the Principal Act as amended by this Act. (2) Where any proceeding which is affected by the provisions of the principal Act as amended by this Act is pending before the appellate tribunal or the High Court on the said date, the appellate tribunal or the High Court may, suo motu, and shall, on an application made in this behalf by the person affected, remand the case relating to such proceeding to the tribunal, for fresh determination of excess land; or for approval of fresh surrenders of excess land, or as the case may be, for fresh selection of the land to be surrendered, in accordance with the provisions of the principal Act as amended by this Act; (3) In any case not provided in clauses (1) and (2) of this section any person, to whom the provisions of the Principal Act as amended by this Act applicable, may within sixty days from the said date file an application before





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top