SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 515

MOTILAL B.NAIK, S.S.M.QUADRI
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Coromandel Paints and Chemicals Ltd. – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three tax revision cases, relating to the same assessee but pertaining to different assessment years, are preferred by the State under section 22 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short "the State Act"), against the common order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in appeals dated 1/07/1987. The question, which pertains to assessment of sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short "the Central Act"), is common in the three revisions and arises out of common facts. Therefore, they are heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) FOR appreciating the question in these cases, we would refer to the facts in Tax Revision Case No. 148 of 1988. It relates to the assessment year 1980-81. The turnover of the assessee included turnover of an amount of Rs. 53,96,110, in respect of which claim for exemption was accepted by the assessing authority under section 6-A of the Central Act on the ground that it is in respect of stock transfers to the branches of the assessee and that it was also covered by declarations in form "f". The Deputy Commissioner (C. T.), Visakhapatnam, in exercise of the




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top