SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 621

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Pulikandam Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Gorantal Veeraswamy – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) : The decision of a learned single Judge in w. P. No. 525/88 dated 10-10-1988 is assailed in this writ appeal. The writ petition was disposed of with some directions. The appellants are the writ petitioners. Respondents herein were also the respondents in the writ petition.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 Gorantla veeraswamy claiming to be the cultivating tenant of the agricultural land of an extent of Ac. 4. 15 in Survey No. 116 of Prakasam district, alleged that he was dispossessed by respondent No. 2 along with the present appellants and filed A. T. C. No. 1/81 before the District Munsif-cum special Officer, Addanki under Section 12 (3) of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) tenancy Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as the act , to declare that he is the cultivating tenant of the schedule land within the meaning of the said Act, to order the resumption of the schedule land in his favour and to deliver the actual physical possession of the same to him. It was resisted by the present appellants and respondent No. 2 Gudluri Sivasankara narayana. The learned District Munsif after holding an enquiry dismissed the petition on 31-12-1985. Gorantla Veeraswamy took the matt














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top