SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 591

S.PARVATHA RAO
Sree Devi Wines – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Kakinada – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner questions the order of the 2nd respondent herein in his RC. No. 2770/94/a4 dated 2-11-1994 suspending the licence of his shop under the name and style of Sri Devi Wines, Attili in Form f. L. 24 bearing Licence No. 67/92-97 "under section 31 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Excise act with immediate effect pending further investigation". The short question is whether there can be such a suspension of the licence under Section 31 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh excise Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) "pending further investigation".

( 2 ) NOTICE before admission was ordered on 15-11-1994 observing as follows:-"what was found when the petitioner s shop was inspected on 17-10-1994 was that the petitioner purchased considerable stock of liquor from Messers Sri laxmi Wines, Penumantra. No non-duty paid stock was found in the premises of the shop. As per the conditions of the licence in form F. L. 24 the petitioner should purchase his stocks for sale only from IML Depot of A. P. B. C. L. Limited, chagallu only. It is stated that, in the circumstances, the Excise Sub-Inspector, attili, registered a case in Crime No. 1/94-95 of Attili range under S




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top