SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 579

S.PARVATHA RAO
Janata Modern Rice Mills – Appellant
Versus
G. Satyanarayana – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by the employer under Section 30 of the Workmen s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen s Compensation, Rangareddy district Zone ( the Commissioner for short) in W. C. Case No. 155 of 1988 dated 18/12/1990. The brief facts are as follows :-

( 2 ) THE respondent who, according to the appellant herein, was working as a helper in the rice mill of the appellant and was involved in an accident on 3/06/1987. He underwent treatment and as a result of the said accident his left hand had to be imputed up to below elbow. The Doctor s certificate shows that the stump length bellow the elbow is 10" form olecranon. This is not disputed. On this basis the injury suffered by the respondent falls under Item 4 of Part II of Schedule I to the Act which gives the list of injuries "deemed to result in permanent partial disablement". The percentage of loss of earning capacity in the case of such is 60%. Under Memo No. C/10441/87 (NF) dated 17/12/1987, the Commissioner calculated the compensation payable to the respondent at Rs. 24,904-12 ps. on the basis that he, was drawing a s









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top