SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 94

G.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO
Nimmagadda Venkaiah – Appellant
Versus
Sangameswara Swamy Temple, sangam Jagarlamudi – Respondent


G. V. L. NARASIMHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises out of an order dated 25-11-1992 passed by the subordinate Judge, Tenali in C. M. A. No. 18 of 1992, setting aside theorder dated 18-5-1992 of the Principal District Munsif, Tenali in I. A. 374 / 92 in O. S. 40 / 1992 granting temporary injunction. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in the suit. First defendant is the temple. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein as the plaintiffs and the defendants.

( 2 ) IT is useful to state a few facts which have given rise to prefer this revision. The plaintiffs filed the suit against the defendants for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective plots in the plaint schedule land. The case of the plaintiffs (petitioner herein) is that they are the cultivating tenants and the first defendant (respondent No. l herein) is the landlord of the suit schedule lands; they have been cultivating tenants since more than 15 years and their lease was renewed in the year 1987 by the Commissioner of Endowments by his order dated 9-1-1987. According to the plaintiffs they are in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top