P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Letters Patent Appeals arise out of the decree and judgment made in A. S- No. 1085 of 1983, partly reversing the decree and judgment in O. S. No. 86 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Cuddapah.

( 2 ) THE appellant in L. P. A. No. 133 of 1991 is the plaintiff, while the legal representative of the first defendant is the appellant in L. P. A. No. 39 of 1992, The parties in these appeals will be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants for the sake of convenience.

( 3 ) THE appellant in L. P. A. No. 133 of 1991 filed O. S. No. 86 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Cuddapah for partition of the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares and for separate possession of one such share together with mesne profits. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 therein, are the alienee and his father respectively. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaint schedule properties are the properties of his joint family of which himself, his father d-2 and his grandfather - P. Gangireddy are co-parceners. During the life time of his grandfather, his uncle, one Gangireddy, got divided from the joint family and went away. His pat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document