M.N.RAO, A.GOPAL RAO
B. Janardhan Gupta (died) – Appellant
Versus
B. Padmanabha Gupta – Respondent
( 1 ) PLAINTIFF is the appellant in this appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, plaintiff died and his son was brought on record as his legal representative.
( 2 ) FOR convenience, the parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.
( 3 ) THE suit was filed for (a) partition and separate possession of plaintiff s one-half share in the plaint, a and b schedule properties and (b) directing the defendant to render a full and detailed account of the income from the plaint schedule properties.
( 4 ) PLAINT a schedule consists of immoveable properties and plaint b schedule consists of rice mill, electric motor, starter, items of machinery and furniture in the rice mill.
( 5 ) THE case of the plaintiff, as per the averments in the plaint is :- The defendant is his younger brother. Their father, Eswaraiah, was doing a petty business at the time of his death. Plaintiff and defendant were members of a joint Hindu Family. The defendant was a minor at that time and he was brought up by the plaintiff till he attained majority. Plaintiff started his own business with M/s. Volkart Brothers as a broker in the year 1928 and continued that business till 1930
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.