P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is the respondent in I. A. No. 10/91 in A. T. C, 1 /89 on the file of the Special Officer-cum-District Munsif, Kamalapuram, is challenging the order dated 7-4-1992 in this revision petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed A. T. C. 1/89 on the file of the Special Officer-cum- district Munsif, Kamaiapuram for declaration that he is the cultivating tenant and for permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein, from interfering with his possession over the petition-schedule land. The respondents engaged an advocate, but since the Advocate reported no instructions, the petition was allowed ex parte on 6-9-1991. Thereafter, the respondents filed an application to set aside the ex parte order. As there was a delay of one year and nine months in filing the said application, they have also filed an application LA. 10/91 to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the ex parte order dated 6-9-1991. The contention of the respondents herein, in the said application is that since the petitioner approached them for settlement and as the mediators settled the matter, the petitioner agreed to surrender the land and give possessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document