SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 148

S.V.MARUTHI
Kohday Engineering Ltd, Bangalore, rep. by its General Manager, A. S. Rama Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Dynamics Ltd. , Hyderabad – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed against the order of the learned District Munsif, sangareddy in E. P. No. 23 of 1991 in O. S. No. 178 of 1989.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF is the petitioner before this Court. He filed the suit O. S. No. 178 of 1989 for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants-respondents from engaging any other agency or itself to complete the work.

( 3 ) IT is necessary to refer to certain facts leading to the filing of the suit before considering the issue that arose for consideration in the revision petition.

( 4 ) TOWNSHIP Package-II (Konkur) work was entrusted to the petitioner by the respondents, vide work order dated 14-6-1988. The petitioner undertook the work, but, however, since he was expected to get the drawings and samples approved by the respondent No. 3, there was considerable delay in execution of the work. According to the petitioner, the delay was entirely due to the default of the respondents in giving approval. According to the work order, the entire work should be completed within 9 to 12 months reckoned from the 15th day of issue of Letter of Intent. Since the work could not be completed within the stipulated period, the 1st responde












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top