P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, M.N.RAO
Chelikam Rajamma – Appellant
Versus
Padileti Venkataswami Reddy – Respondent
( 1 ) ALTHOUGH this Letter Patent Appeal is from an interlocutory order passed by a learned single Judge granting interim stay of appointment of receiver made in I. A. No. 182 of 1990 in O. S. No. 49 of 1990 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s court, Gudur subject to the condition of defendants 1 to 3 depositing a sum of rs. 10,000/- per annum from the date of filing of the said I. A. till the disposal of c. M. A. No. 1465 of 1992 preferred by the defendants, the learned counsel for both sides agreed to argue the main C. M. A, itself. Accordingly, we have heard the learned counsel for both sides and this judgment will dispose of the C. M. A. itself. The parties in this appeal are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit o. S. No. 49 of 1990.
( 2 ) CHELIKAM Rajamma, the plaintiff (respondent in the C. M. A. ,) instituted the suit O. S. No. 3 of 1990 for partition of the plaint schedule property into four shares and for allotment of one share to her and for future profits.
( 3 ) THE first defendant is the Manger of the joint family properties, the second defendant is the wife of the first defendant, and the third defendant is the sister of the second def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.