SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 261

S.S.M.QUADRI
Battu Pedda Jangaiah – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Rangareddy Dist. – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THESE fifteen cases, out of which nine are Civil Revision Petitions and six are writ Petitions, arise out of the same facts and raise some questions of law. Therefore, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the questions involved in these cases, it would suffice to refer the facts in C. R. P. 3100 of 1989. In this case, a sale deed was executed by one K. Suguna Devi, wife of Madhusudhan Reddy in favour of Amboji Pentaiah in respect of an extent of Ac. 10. 00 of land in Pulmamidi village. Pursuant to the sale deed, the possession of the land was delivered to the vendee therein. Under section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act, 1950 (for short the Act ), the parties to the saledeed filed applications before the revenue authorities for validation of sale. The case was also noted in what is called as call book . The Tahsildar, I brahimpatnam issued validation certificate under the said Section on 21-12-1974. It appears that against the said order of the Tahsildar, an appeal was filed by the Special Tahsildar and authorised Officer (Land Reforms), R. R. District

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top